Legal Opinion

In re the Personal Restraint of Fleming

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1996No. 63419-0PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

— These consolidated petitions for review concern whether an untimely restitution order constitutes a "fundamental defect” justifying collateral review and dismissal of the restitution order. Because Washington law authorizes the imposition of restitution, we hold that *531an untimely restitution order, although a sentencing error, does not rise to the level of a fundamental defect. Accordingly, we dismiss the petitions.

Petitioner Russell Smith was charged with second degree assault of a child and third degree escape in King County on March 5, 1993. On April 12, 1993, he pleaded guilty to the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. In Re the Personal Restraint of CookWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. In Re the Personal Restraint of HewsWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Marley v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. KrallWashington Supreme Court · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. State v. FordWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. In re the Personal Restraint of GoodwinWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. BahlWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. BahlWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  5. In re the Personal Restraint of AndressWashington Supreme Court · 2002

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API