In re the Personal Restraint of Fleming
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
— These consolidated petitions for review concern whether an untimely restitution order constitutes a "fundamental defect” justifying collateral review and dismissal of the restitution order. Because Washington law authorizes the imposition of restitution, we hold that *531an untimely restitution order, although a sentencing error, does not rise to the level of a fundamental defect. Accordingly, we dismiss the petitions.
Petitioner Russell Smith was charged with second degree assault of a child and third degree escape in King County on March 5, 1993. On April 12, 1993, he pleaded guilty to the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- In Re the Personal Restraint of CookWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re the Personal Restraint of HewsWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Marley v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. KrallWashington Supreme Court · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- State v. FordWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- In re the Personal Restraint of GoodwinWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. BahlWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. BahlWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- In re the Personal Restraint of AndressWashington Supreme Court · 2002
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.