Legal Opinion

Black v. Arizala

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 12, 2004No. CC 9611-09017, 9708-06851; CA A104791; SC S49774PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.

This is an action for damages alleging securities law violations and related torts. The principal issue on review is whether the trial court erred in dismissing the action on the ground that the parties’ limited partnership agreement required plaintiffs to file their claims in San Juan, Puerto Rico. The Court of Appeals reversed. For the reasons set out below, we affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals.

The trial court consolidated two actions by two groups of plaintiffs against two overlapping groups of defendants. On review, the only claims before the court are those of three parties to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Timberline Equipment Co., Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Parfi Holding AB v. Mirror Image Internet, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2002
  3. Derenco, Inc. v. Benj. Franklin Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Reeves v. Chem Industrial CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  5. State Ex Rel. Kahn v. TazwellOregon Supreme Court · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Espinoza v. Evergreen Helicopters, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Livingston v. METROPOLITAN PEDIATRICS, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  3. Strawn v. Farmers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  4. Munson v. Valley Energy Investment Fund, U. S., LPCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. Curzi v. Oregon State LotteryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API