Lindell v. Kalugin
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.
In this personal injury action, defendant Kalugin moved for a defense medical examination pursuant to ORCP 44 A. Plaintiff Lindell objected on the ground that he would not submit to such an examination without being allowed to bring a friend, family member, or counsel with him. The trial court declined to impose the discovery condition that Lindell requested. Lindell then petitioned this court for a writ of mandamus compelling the trial court to permit the examination only on condition that he be allowed to bring with him a friend, family member, or counsel. This court issued an alternative…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Holien v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
- State Ex Rel. Western Seed Production Corp. v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- State Ex Rel. Ricco v. BiggsOregon Supreme Court · 1953
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Couey v. AtkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- Oregon Occupational Safety & Health Division v. CBI Services, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. Guzman/HecklerOregon Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. EggersOregon Supreme Court · 2024
- State v. MooreOregon Supreme Court · 2017
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.