Legal Opinion

A. G. v. Guitron

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 2011No. CC 060909578; CA A137591; SC S059166PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalters, J.

In this civil action, we decide that ORCP 44 C required plaintiff to deliver to defendants, at defendants’ request, a copy of all written reports of examinations related to the psychological injuries for which plaintiff sought recovery, including, specifically, the report of an examination by a psychologist retained by plaintiffs counsel for the purpose of the litigation. Because defendants requested and plaintiff failed to deliver that report, the trial court entered an order, pursuant to ORCP 44 D, precluding the psychologist from testifying at trial, and defendants ultimately prevailed.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Stevens v. CzerniakOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Waddill v. Anchor Hocking, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Pamplin v. VictoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. VanornumOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Lindell v. KaluginOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Meyer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  4. Association of Unit Owners of Timbercrest Condominiums v. WarrenOregon Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State v. KreisOregon Supreme Court · 2019

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API