Legal Opinion
In Re IBM Antitrust Litigation
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Decided April 19, 1972No. 18PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
2Per curiam
The Telex Corporation brought this suit against IBM in the Northern District of Oklahoma. The Panel issued an order to show cause why this action should not be transferred to the District of Minnesota and assigned to the Honorable Philip Neville for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with two other anti-trust actions against IBM. IBM and Greyhound Computer Corporation favor transfer; Telex and Control Data Corporation are opposed. On the basis of the papers submitted by the parties and the hearing held, we hold that transfer of the Telex action will serve the…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re Multidistrict Private Civil Treble Damage Antitrust Litigation Involving IBMUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1969
- Greyhound Computer Corp. v. IBMUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1970
- Levin v. IBM & Levin-Townsend Computer Corp.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1970
- Data Research Corp. v. IBMUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1971
- Koratron Co v. W. Koury Co.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1971
4Cited by4 opinions
- Telex Corp. v. International Business MacHines Corp.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1973
- In Re Uranium Industry Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1978
- In Re Equity Funding Corp. of America Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1974
- In Re Equity Funding Corp. of America Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1974