Legal Opinion

Koratron Co v. W. Koury Co.

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided May 12, 1971No. Civil Action No. C-147-G-70; No. 20PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

2Per curiam

In June of 1969, four actions involving Koratron’s “permanent press” process for garments were transferred to the Northern District of California for assignment to Judge William E. Doyle. In re Koratron Litigation, 302 F.Supp. 239 (Jud.Pan.Mult.Lit.1969). Those cases and the twelve related actions originally filed in the Northern District of California or transferred there under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) all raised common fact questions involving Koratron’s use of its patents, trademark and licensing agreements concerning the “permanent press” process. Koratron brought this action…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Multidistrict Patent & Antitrust Litigation Involving KoratronUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1969
  2. In Re Multidistrict Private Civil Treble Damage Litigation Involving Gypsum WallboardUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1969
  3. In Re Multidistrict Litigation Involving Frost PatentUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1970
  4. In re Multidistrict Private Civil Treble Damage Litigation Involving Plumbing FixturesUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1970

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re IBM Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API