Koratron Co v. W. Koury Co.
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
2Per curiam
In June of 1969, four actions involving Koratron’s “permanent press” process for garments were transferred to the Northern District of California for assignment to Judge William E. Doyle. In re Koratron Litigation, 302 F.Supp. 239 (Jud.Pan.Mult.Lit.1969). Those cases and the twelve related actions originally filed in the Northern District of California or transferred there under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) all raised common fact questions involving Koratron’s use of its patents, trademark and licensing agreements concerning the “permanent press” process. Koratron brought this action…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re Multidistrict Patent & Antitrust Litigation Involving KoratronUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1969
- In Re Multidistrict Private Civil Treble Damage Litigation Involving Gypsum WallboardUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1969
- In Re Multidistrict Litigation Involving Frost PatentUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1970
- In re Multidistrict Private Civil Treble Damage Litigation Involving Plumbing FixturesUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1970
4Cited by1 opinion
- In Re IBM Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1972