Legal Opinion

Greyhound Computer Corp. v. IBM

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided November 27, 1970No. Civil Action No. 70C 1944; Civil Action No. 70C 2203; No. 18PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER PER CURIAM.

On July 31, 1969, the Panel ordered that three antitrust actions against IBM in the Southern District of New York be transferred to the District of Minnesota for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with a similar action filed there. In re IBM Antitrust Litigation, 302 F.Supp. 796 (JPML 1969). A later tag-along case was also transferred to Minnesota in July, 1970, In re IBM Antitrust Litigation, 314 F.Supp. 1253 (JPML 1970).1 After slightly more than a year of pretrial discovery in that district before the Honorable Philip Ne-ville, settlements were…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Multidistrict Private Civil Treble Damage Antitrust Litigation Involving IBMUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1969
  2. Levin v. IBM & Levin-Townsend Computer Corp.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1970
  3. In re Multidistrict Private Civil Treble Damage Antitrust Litigation Involving IBMUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1970

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Uranium Industry Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1978
  2. In Re IBM Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1972
  3. Data Research Corp. v. IBMUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1971
  4. In Re Equity Funding Corp. of America Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1974
  5. In Re Equity Funding Corp. of America Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API