In Re Uranium Industry Antitrust Litigation
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
STANLEY A. WEIGEL, Judge of the Panel.
I. BACKGROUND
This litigation consists of four actions pending in the following federal districts: the Northern District of Illinois, the Southern District of New York, the District of Colorado and the Eastern District of Tennessee. Each action involves an alleged conspiracy to increase the price of uranium and to divide portions of the world uranium market.
The Illinois action was filed by Westinghouse Electric Corporation (Westinghouse) on October 15, 1976 against twelve foreign and seventeen domestic companies alleged to be producers,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. Cooper Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Pfizer Inc. v. Government of IndiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- In Re Equity Funding Corp. of America Securities LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1977
- In Re Equity Funding Corp. of America Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1974
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re Air Crash Disaster Near Chicago, Etc.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1979
- In Re Uranium Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1980
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Rio Algom Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1980
- In re Food Fair Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1979
- Homestake Mining Corp. v. Enerdyne Corp.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.