Data Research Corp. v. IBM
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
2Per curiam
Since it appeared to the Clerk of the Panel that each of the above actions shared common questions of fact with the actions previously transferred to the District of Minnesota and assigned to Judge Phillip Neville for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings under 28 U.S.C. § 1407, a “Conditional Transfer Order” was entered transferring both actions to the District of Minnesota on the basis of the prior hearings and for the reasons expressed in previous opinions and orders of the Panel. In re IBM Antitrust Litigation, 319 F.Supp. 926 (Jud.Pan.Mult.Lit.1970), 314…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re Multidistrict Private Civil Treble Damage Antitrust Litigation Involving IBMUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1969
- Greyhound Computer Corp. v. IBMUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1970
- Levin v. IBM & Levin-Townsend Computer Corp.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1970
4Cited by1 opinion
- In Re IBM Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1972