Legal Opinion · Concurrence

In Re Equity Funding Corp. of America Securities Litigation

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided April 25, 1974No. 142Published

1Concurrence

WILLIAM H. BECKER, Judge of the Panel

(concurring).

In addition to full concurrence in the majority opinion, a draft of this concurring opinion was prepared when only the *1389majority opinion was available. The purpose of the original draft was to emphasize the important differences in the facts of this ease compared to the facts of the second Penn Central ease, on which was based the decision to separate the commercial paper cases, pending in other districts, and to transfer them to the Southern District of New York. In re Penn Central Litigation, 325 F.Supp. 309 (Jud.Pan.Mult.Lit.1971).

Only this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Yarn Processing Patent Validity LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1972
  2. In Re Penn Central Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1971
  3. Greyhound Computer Corp. v. International Business MacHines Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1972
  4. Greyhound Computer Corp. v. IBMUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1970
  5. In Re IBM Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API