Legal Opinion

Magenis v. Fisher Broadcasting, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 10, 1990No. A8711-07059; CA A60093PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment entered after the trial court’s dismissal of their claim for invasion of privacy by “false light” and the jury’s verdict for defendants in their claim for invasion of privacy by intrusion upon seclusion. We affirm.

Plaintiffs, Timothy and Kathy Magenis and their four minor children, filed their complaint on November 18, 1987, alleging that defendants “trespassed upon * * * plaintiffs’ seclusion” when they accompanied police officers, who were executing a warrant to search plaintiffs’ residence, and filmed the raid with video cameras and that defendants placed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Eastwood v. Cascade Broadcasting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. McLain v. Boise Cascade CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Rinsley v. BrandtDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1977
  4. Brink v. GriffithWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Dean v. Guard Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Shulman v. Group W Productions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Slover v. Oregon State Board of Clinical Social WorkersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. Rumbauskas v. CantorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  4. Blackthorne v. PosnerDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1995
  5. City of Tacoma v. Tacoma News, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API