Slover v. Oregon State Board of Clinical Social Workers
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing his amended complaint for failure to state ultimate facts sufficient to constitute a claim. ORCP 21 A(8). Plaintiff is a licensed clinical social worker. He contends that he properly pleaded six claims against the Oregon State Board of Clinical Social Workers (the Board) and its members and administrators. Assuming that facts alleged in plaintiffs complaint are true, Glubka v. Long, 115 Or App 236, 238, 837 P2d 553 (1992), we review to determine whether those facts state a claim. Hansen v. Anderson, 113 Or App 216,218,831 P2d 717 (1992). We affirm…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Uptown Heights Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Seafirst Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of the Northwest v. DoeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- Beecher v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Glubka v. LongCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Shearer v. LambertOregon Supreme Court · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- Gardner v. MartinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Arnett v. Bank of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2012
- Stevens v. ForenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Bates v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 2014
- Moyer v. Columbia State BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.