Legal Opinion

Dean v. Guard Publishing Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 22, 1985No. 16-83-01564; CA A33904PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.

In this invasion of privacy action, plaintiff appeals a judgment dismissing his complaint without leave to replead. Although it did not state a reason for its action, the trial court held either (1) that plaintiffs assertion in his complaint that defendant Guard Publishing Co. (defendant) placed him in a “false light” does not state an actionable claim under Oregon law or (2) that the facts plaintiff alleged do not, as a matter of law, permit him to recover under that theory. We hold that “false light” is- a tort in Oregon and that plaintiff is entitled to replead in order to state a claim…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Time, Inc. v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Wheeler v. GreenOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Bank of Oregon v. Independent News, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Flowers v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. West v. Media General Convergence, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Reesman v. HighfillOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Jensen v. SawyersUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Magenis v. Fisher Broadcasting, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  5. Bernards v. Summit Real Estate Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API