Legal Opinion

Brink v. Griffith

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1964No. 37114PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

Plaintiff, by complaint setting forth two separate claims for relief, instituted this action against Albert L. Griffith and his wife seeking damages arising out of the same occurrence. Plaintiff predicated his first claim for damages upon the theory of defamation and his second upon the theory of invasion of privacy. Both claims were, following trial, submitted to a jury. It returned a verdict favorable to plaintiff, segregating the award by allowing the sum of $10,000 upon the defamation claim and $5,000 upon the invasion of privacy claim. During trial, the trial court dismissed defendant…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Physicians & Dentists Credit Bureau, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Themo v. New England Newspaper Publishing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  3. Kilcup v. McManusWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Woodhouse v. PowlesWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Shaw v. GreerArizona Supreme Court · 1948

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Linda K. Wood v. Steven C. Ostrander Neil MaloneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  2. Reid v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Reid v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Eastwood v. Cascade Broadcasting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Munsell v. Ideal Food StoresSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API