Legal Opinion

Rumbauskas v. Cantor

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 30, 1994PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

O’HERN, Justice.

In an earlier time, the great Judge Wilfred Jayne might have written of this case: “In several of its aspects this cause is an unfashionable one to be introduced to a court * * * for determination.” Ta mi v. Pikowitz, 138 N.J.Eq. 410, 410, 48 A.2d 221 (Ch.1946). An innocuous rivalry between two suitors of a woman is ordinarily not the business of the law. In this case, however, what began as mere harassment of a rival suitor escalated into stalkings and threats to kill. Fortunately, the processes of criminal law intervened to save…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Montells v. HaynesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  2. Eastwood v. Cascade Broadcasting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Slack v. Kanawha County Housing & Redevelopment AuthorityWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Hull v. Curtis Publishing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Bernstein v. National Broadcasting CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1955

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. In Re Nickelodeon Consumer Privacy LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
  2. Leonard C. McNemar v. The Disney Store, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  3. Lawlor v. North American Corporation of IllinoisIllinois Supreme Court · 2013
  4. McGrogan v. TillSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  5. Weld v. Glaxo Wellcome Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API