Legal Opinion

In Re CMS Energy ERISA Litigation

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided March 31, 2004No. 02-CV-72834PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS

STEEH, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Currently before the court in this consolidated ERISA litigation is a Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss brought by defendants CMS Energy Corporation (“CMS”), Consumers Energy Company (“Consumers”), CMS Marketing Services and Trading Company (“CMS MST”), Victor J. Fryling, Laura L. Mount-castle and Preston Hopper; a Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss brought by individual defendants…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Briscoe v. FineCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  2. In Re Citigroup ERISA LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  3. In Re Polaroid ERISA LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  4. Raymond Pfeil v. State Street Bank and Trust CoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  5. In Re AEP Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2004

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API