Legal Opinion

Raymond Pfeil v. State Street Bank and Trust Co

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 22, 2012No. 10-2302PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

S. THOMAS ANDERSON, District Judge.

Raymond M. Pfeil and Michael Kammer, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, allege that State Street Bank and Trust breached its fiduciary duty under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”). State Street was the fiduciary for the two primary retirement plans offered by General Motors, and the plaintiffs were plan participants. The plaintiffs allege that State Street breached its fiduciary duty by continuing to allow participants to invest in GM common stock, even though reliable public information indicated that GM was…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Guidotti v. Legal Helpers Debt Resolution, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  2. Fifth Third Bancorp v. DudenhoefferSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. Estate of William R. Barney, J v. PNC Bank, National AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  4. Lanfear v. Home Depot, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
  5. DiGeronimo Aggregates, LLC v. Michael ZemlaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API