Legal Opinion

In Re AEP Erisa Litigation

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided August 10, 2004No. 1:03-cv-00067PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

MARBLEY, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the Court on Defendants’, American Electric Power Company, Inc. (“AEP”), American Electric Power Service Corporation (“AEPSC”), E. Linn Draper, Jr. (“Draper”), and Thomas V. Shockley, III (“Shockley”), Motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Amended Complaint (“Motion to Dismiss”). For the reasons that follow, Defendants’ Motion is DENIED.

II. FACTS

This is an action filed under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1132, et seq. Plaintiffs, Kermit D. Bridges and Selena Plentl, bring suit…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Coan v. KaufmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  2. In Re Morgan Stanley Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  3. Bridges v. American Elec. Power Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  4. In Re Cardinal Health, Inc. ERISA LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2006
  5. Howell v. Motorola, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API