Legal Opinion
In Re Polaroid ERISA Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 31, 2005No. 03 Civ.8335(WHP)PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PAULEY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs are four employees of Polaroid Corporation (“Polaroid” or the “Company”) who participated in the Polaroid Retirement Savings Plan (the “Plan”). They bring this consolidated putative class action pursuant to Section 502 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1132. Plaintiffs claim that the defendants, eighteen officers and directors of Polaroid as well as State Street Bank & Trust Company (“State Street”) and Polaroid, breached their fiduciary duties to Plan participants by, inter alia, maintaining Plan…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Salahuddin v. CuomoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- In Re Bear Stearns Companies, Inc. Securities, Derivative, & Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- In Re Citigroup ERISA LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- In Re Beacon Associates LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- In Re Morgan Stanley Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Fraser v. Fiduciary Trust Co. InternationalDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.