Legal Opinion

Argo v. Goodstein

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 14, 1967No. Appeals, 215 and 216PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Cohen,

This is a trespass action in which appellee, a blind man, seeks to recover damages for injuries sustained as a result of a fall. We heard argument on this matter, but allowed reargument because we had failed to consider at length a question which has been a determining factor in three recent decisions of this Court. That question is whether a new trial should be granted because of a secret communication between judge and jury without the presence of counsel.

The instant jury retired for deliberations at 10:87 a.m. on May 19, 1964. After breaking for lunch, the jury…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Weissman v. PRASHKERSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. Yarsunas v. BorosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Kersey Manufacturing Co. v. RozicSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Gould v. ArgiroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Glendenning v. SprowlsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BradleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Bruckshaw v. Frankford Hospital of the PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Commonwealth v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Colosimo v. Pennsylvania Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API