Argo v. Goodstein
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mb. Justice Cohen,
This is a trespass action in which appellee, a blind man, seeks to recover damages for injuries sustained as a result of a fall. We heard argument on this matter, but allowed reargument because we had failed to consider at length a question which has been a determining factor in three recent decisions of this Court. That question is whether a new trial should be granted because of a secret communication between judge and jury without the presence of counsel.
The instant jury retired for deliberations at 10:87 a.m. on May 19, 1964. After breaking for lunch, the jury…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Weissman v. PRASHKERSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Yarsunas v. BorosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Kersey Manufacturing Co. v. RozicSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Gould v. ArgiroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Glendenning v. SprowlsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BradleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Bruckshaw v. Frankford Hospital of the PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Colosimo v. Pennsylvania Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.