Glendenning v. Sprowls
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Bell,
This was a trespass action for personal injuries; the facts concerning the accident are, on this appeal, unimportant. The jury found defendant guilty of negligence and awarded plaintiff a verdict of $18,000. Defendant appealed from the judgment which was entered on the verdict and asks a new trial on the grounds (1) that the verdict was excessive, and (2) that the trial Judge was guilty of misconduct. We shall consider only the second contention.
It is admitted by all parties that while the jury was deliberating, the trial Judge, without the knowledge of either…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sommer v. HuberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Hunsicker v. WaidelichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
3Cited by23 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BradleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Bruckshaw v. Frankford Hospital of the PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Kersey Manufacturing Co. v. RozicSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Argo v. GoodsteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Gould v. ArgiroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.