Legal Opinion

Gould v. Argiro

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 24, 1966No. Appeals, 123 and 124PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Cohen,

As a result of an accident involving appellants’ truck and appellee’s automobile cross-suits were instituted. The suits were consolidated for trial and the jury found in favor of appellee in both actions.

The opinion of the lower court recites that, after it retired to deliberate, the jury sent two requests for further instructions to the trial judge. The questions were: 1. “Since this was a dual transmission truck, what gear was it in as it approached the top of the hill?” 2. “What is the top union wage for welders?”

To each of these questions the judge indicated…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sebastianelli v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Glendenning v. SprowlsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Sommer v. HuberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  4. Hunsicker v. WaidelichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FreelandSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. BradleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Commonwealth v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Yarsunas v. BorosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Kersey Manufacturing Co. v. RozicSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API