Commonwealth v. Bradley
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
HUTCHINSON, Justice:
This is the Commonwealth’s appeal by allowance from an order of Superior Court vacating Philadelphia Common Pleas’ judgment of sentence and granting a new trial after a jury found appellee guilty of rape, robbery and involuntary deviate sexual intercourse. Superior Court acted because it felt “[t]he Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has strictly prohibited communication between the judge and jury other than in open court and in the presence of counsel for all parties.” (Emphasis supplied). Reviewing our holdings on this issue convinces us we must reconsider…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Parker v. GladdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Commonwealth v. TruittSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Commonwealth v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Yarsunas v. BorosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Kersey Manufacturing Co. v. RozicSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SneedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Commonwealth v. ChesterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. FreelandSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth, Aplt v. Pelzer, K.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.