Yarsunas v. Boros
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Justice Eagen,
This is a personal injury action arising out of an automobile accident in which the plaintiff was seriously injured. The issue came on for trial, and the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $11,-300. The lower court granted plaintiffs motion for a new trial. The defendant appeals.
In the court below, the plaintiff seeking a new trial strenuously argued that the verdict was totally inadequate in view of the injuries suffered. The court overruled this contention and expressed the view, that the evidence as to the extent of the injuries caused by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kersey Manufacturing Co. v. RozicSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Gould v. ArgiroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Sommer v. HuberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Hunsicker v. WaidelichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
3Cited by30 opinions
- Etheredge v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Commonwealth v. BradleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Bruckshaw v. Frankford Hospital of the PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Commonwealth v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Argo v. GoodsteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.