Colosimo v. Pennsylvania Electric Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
HUTCHINSON, Justice.
Appellant, Pennsylvania Electric Company (Penelec), appeals by allowance an order of Superior Court sitting en banc which affirmed a McKean County Common Pleas order granting appellee’s motion for a new trial. 337 Pa.Super. 363, 486 A.2d 1378. Common Pleas granted the new trial because one of the jurors selected had previously retained counsel for additional defendant Cardamone in an independent matter and met with counsel on that matter during the trial in violation of the trial judge’s express prohibition of such contacts. We disapprove the empaneling…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Thompson v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- SMALICH v. WestfallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Commonwealth v. PronkoskieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Austin v. RidgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Commonwealth v. BradleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Coker v. SM Flickinger Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Spang & Co. v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Kozak v. StruthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Bruckshaw v. Frankford Hospital of the PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Shinal, M., et ux, Aplts. v. Toms M.D., S.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.