Legal Opinion

James v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1962PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

This is a case involving a dual-purpose trip on the part of the employee and the only issue is whether there is credible evidence to sustain the finding Wise was performing services growing out of and incidental to his employment at the time of the accident. There is no issue raised that when Wise left Hayward and started toward Washburn he had two purposes in mind, one to drum up business and sell cars for his employer and the other a personal interest of arranging loans for the Indian students. The thrust of the appellants’ argument is that when Wise started back toward Red Cliff with the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Claim of Dependents of Marks v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Barragar v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Richardson v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Voswinkel v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Neese v. State Medical Society of WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Tyrrell v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Hunter v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Continental Casualty Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Bergner v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API