Richardson v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, C. J.
The only testimony given before the examiner was that of the applicant. He testified he was a resident of Eau Claire; that for several months prior to his injury he was employed by Klauck Motor Sales of Stanley, Wisconsin, as a salesman of automobiles and electrical appliances; he was paid a salary of $25 per week plus commissions on sales made; that Klauck Motor Sales supplied him with an automobile; that Klauck furnished the gasoline and Richardson paid for the oil. His work was to travel around the area of Stanley and Eau Claire to develop prospects and make sales for his employer; he was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Claim of Dependents of Marks v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Beem v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
- Molinaro v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Bowen v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
- Voswinkel v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bumpas v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Lager v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- Reich v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Leist v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
- Black River Dairy Products, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.