Continental Casualty Co. v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.
The findings of the Industrial Commission are somewhat skimpy, but the testimony shows that on the trip some calls were to be made on distributors and in fact a call was made on distributor Vernon Mansch at Slayton, Minnesota. At the time Mansch was indebted to Lincoln Sales Corporation in the sum of $8,000 and was interested in another outlet in Iowa. By prearrangement Mansch had made the hunting arrangements at the request of the' sales manager and went on the hunting trip with them. There was testimony that Leonard Oster, who owned 50 percent of the stock of the company and was its…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Claim of Dependents of Marks v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Barragar v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Milwaukee Toy Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Leigh Aitchison, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
- Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fish v. White Equipment Sales & Service, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Hanmer v. Department of Industry Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Marlin Electric Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Tyrrell v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Bechen v. American Guaranty & Liability InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.