Legal Opinion

Solberg v. FMC Corp., Northern Ordinance Division

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 29, 1982No. 82-621PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLEY, Justice.

Relators, FMC Corporation and its compensation insurer, challenge a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals awarding FMC’s employee Tor Sol-berg concurrent temporary total disability and retraining benefits pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 176.101, subd. 7 (1978). Having concluded that Minn.Stat. § 176.102, subd. 11 (1980) governs the amount of compensation payable to employee during retraining, we reverse the decision insofar as it awarded compensation.

Employee, a grinder, sustained a seriously disabling back injury in the course of his employment on February 28,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rippentrop v. Imperial Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. Nelson v. National Biscuit CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Leahy v. St. Mary's HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Broos v. Portec, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Sherman v. Whirlpool Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Gutz v. Honeywell, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Granberg v. PCL ConstructionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API