Granberg v. PCL Construction
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
• OPINION
WAHL, Justice.
This is an appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals holding that retraining benefits were “monetary benefits” and that the amount of benefits due were to be calculated under the law in effect on the date of injury. The sole issue for review is whether retraining benefits should be calculated under the law in effect on the date of injury or under the law in effect on the date the employer’s liability for retraining benefits was established. Concluding that retraining benefits are monetary benefits, we affirm.
The facts in this case are not in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sherman v. Whirlpool Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Solberg v. FMC Corp., Northern Ordinance DivisionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982