Legal Opinion

Granberg v. PCL Construction

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 27, 1989No. CX-88-2128Published

1Opinion of the Court

• OPINION

WAHL, Justice.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals holding that retraining benefits were “monetary benefits” and that the amount of benefits due were to be calculated under the law in effect on the date of injury. The sole issue for review is whether retraining benefits should be calculated under the law in effect on the date of injury or under the law in effect on the date the employer’s liability for retraining benefits was established. Concluding that retraining benefits are monetary benefits, we affirm.

The facts in this case are not in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sherman v. Whirlpool Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Solberg v. FMC Corp., Northern Ordinance DivisionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API