Legal Opinion

Broos v. Portec, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 22, 1985No. C6-1186, C7-85-1200PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

Both parties, for different reasons, sought review of a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals (WCCA) which affirmed the compensation judge’s determination that employee had sustained additional permanent partial disability to his left arm as a result of an injury sustained on February 13, 1979; that he had been entitled to benefits during retraining of 125% of his temporary total disability rate; that the employer had overpaid him compensation during retraining and was entitled to recovery of the overpayment pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 176.179 (1984); and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Warner v. ZaiserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  2. Yaeger v. Delano Granite WorksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  3. Tracy v. Streater/Litton IndustriesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. Boltz v. ARMOUR AGRICULTURAL CHEMICAL COMPANYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  5. Solberg v. FMC Corp., Northern Ordinance DivisionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Owens Ex Rel. Owens v. Water Gremlin Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  2. Gasper v. Northern Star Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Jacobowitch v. Bell & HowellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Zanmiller v. Aetna Technical Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Heim v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API