Leahy v. St. Mary's Hospital
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONETT, Justice.
This appeal raises questions as to whether a workers’ compensation claim for retraining benefits is governed by the law in effect at the time of the work-related injury or by the law as subsequently changed. Both the employee and the employer-insurer seek review here of the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for recomputation of the retraining benefits.
Patricia Ann Leahy, the employee-respondent, injured her back in 1956 while working as a nurse’s aid for relator St. Mary’s Hospital in Rochester, Minnesota.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Yaeger v. Delano Granite WorksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Norby v. Arctic Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Rippentrop v. Imperial Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Solberg v. FMC Corp., Northern Ordinance DivisionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Tibbitts v. E. G. Staude Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hengemuhle v. Long Prairie JayceesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Thompson v. North Dakota Workers' Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Marose v. Maislin TransportSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Jacka v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Sherman v. Whirlpool Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.