Legal Opinion
Sherman v. Whirlpool Corp.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 2, 1986No. C7-85-2220PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YETKA, Justice.
On November 4, 1983, employee-respondent Sharon J. Sherman submitted a request for rehabilitation benefits to the Department of Labor and Industry. A rehabilitation specialist found Sherman eligible for rehabilitation services by an order filed March 14, 1984. Employer-relator Whirlpool and insurer-relator Aetna appealed, and the rehabilitation review panel affirmed the specialist’s order on March 11, 1985. Relators appealed to the WCCA, which affirmed the panel’s decision. The relators petitioned this court for a writ of certiorari, which we issued on December 4, 1985. We…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Yaeger v. Delano Granite WorksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Paul v. FaricySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Boltz v. ARMOUR AGRICULTURAL CHEMICAL COMPANYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Leahy v. St. Mary's HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Rippentrop v. Imperial Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jacka v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Donald D. David v. Bartel Enterprises (Nitro Green), Relator, and SFM Mutual Insurance Company, Relator.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Gutz v. Honeywell, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Donald D. David v. Bartel Enterprises (Nitro Green), Relator, and SFM Mutual Insurance Company, Relator.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Granberg v. PCL ConstructionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.