Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Board of Trustees

California Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1904No. S.F. No. 3768PublishedCited by 23 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, C.

This is a suit for mandamus against the hoard of trustees of the city of Alameda and the trustees individu ally. The case involves the effect of an ordinance of the defendant board, and the refusal of the board to comply with its terms.

The ordinance, so far as material, is as follows:—

Section 1: “Whenever ten per cent of the legal voters of the city of Alameda shall petition in writing therefor, the board of trustees shall submit to said voters such proposition of local public interest as may be specified in said petition, said submission to be made for the purpose of enabling the.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kellogg v. City of OshkoshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Brightman v. KirnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. City and County of San Francisco v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Kissinger v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Davis v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. In Re CollieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. City and County of San Francisco v. PattersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API