Alaska Conservation Foundation v. Pebble Limited Partnership
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WINFREE, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Alaska Statute 09.60.010 was enacted to abrogate our previous common law public interest litigation attorney's fees framework and replace it with a narrower constitutional litigation framework. The statute both encourages and protects those challenging governmental action as a violation of federal or state constitutional rights. First, the statute provides that a successful claimant generally is entitled to an award of full reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred in connection with a constitutional claim, unless the claimant had "sufficient…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Gilbert v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Unida v. VolpeDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1972
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Huit v. Ashwater Burns, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2016
- Alaska Association of Naturopathic Physicians v. State, Division of Corporations, Business & Professional LicensingAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
- DeVilbiss v. Matanuska-Susitna BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
- Manning v. State, Dept. of Fish & GameAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
- In Re Hospitalization of Paige M.Alaska Supreme Court · 2018
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.