Legal Opinion
Bearder v. State
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 16, 2011No. A10-0101PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEYER, Justice.
At issue in this case is the interplay between the newborn screening statutes, Minn.Stat. §§ 144.125-.128 (2010), and the Genetic Privacy Act, Minn.Stat. § 13.386 (2010).1 The Minnesota Department of Health, as part of its newborn screening program, collects blood samples of newborn children to test for various disorders. The Department has retained the excess blood samples and the test results. The Department has used the blood samples for purposes other than the initial screening of newborn children and has allowed outside research organizations to use the blood…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Amgen Inc., Plaintiff-Cross v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc. (Now Known as Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) and Transkaryotic Therapies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Thomas Cameron KincadeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Christensen v. Hennepin Transportation Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Armstead v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Dukowitz v. Hannon Security ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Vassallo ex rel. Brown v. MajeskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Minnesota Laborers Health & Welfare Fund v. Granite Re, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. ErlandsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- State v. AtwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.