Legal Opinion

State v. Atwood

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 13, 2019No. A17-1463PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THISSEN, Justice.

In this case, we must determine whether a blood sample drawn by a medical professional during the course of emergency medical treatment is "information" within the scope of Minnesota's statutory physician-patient privilege, codified at Minn. Stat. § 595.02, subd. 1(d) (2018). The statute provides:

A licensed physician or surgeon, dentist, or chiropractor shall not, without the consent of the patient, be allowed to disclose any information or any opinion based thereon which the professional acquired in attending the patient in a professional capacity, and which was necessary to…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. State v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  2. Price v. Standard Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  3. State v. StaatSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  4. Ali M. Shire v. Rosemount, Inc., Self-Insured/Berkley Risk Administrators Company, LLC, Relators, and Twin Cities Orthopedics, P.A., Crosstown Surgery Center, and Minnesota Department of Human Services/BRS, Intervenors.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
  5. State v. EmersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Laurissa Wredberg v. Canvas Health, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2026
  2. Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Tom Hunt, Steve Simon, ...Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
  3. State of Minnesota v. Anthony Richard SmebyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
  4. State of Minnesota v. Anthony Richard SmebySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API