Legal Opinion

Armstead v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 20, 1996No. 133PublishedCited by 92 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAKER, Judge.

In this case we consider the statutory and constitutional limitations on the admissibility of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) evidence. Specifically, we must determine the effect of Maryland Code (1974, 1995 Repl.Vol., 1995 Cum.Supp.) § 10-915 of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article1 on the admissibility of both the basic evidence of a DNA “match” and the descriptive statistics that are typically offered in support of a match. We shall hold that the statute renders both components of DNA evidence admissible. We shall also hold that *44the admission of DNA evidence in this case…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  3. United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Dowling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Lisenba v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. State v. CopelandWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Watts v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. KinderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  4. Merzbacher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  5. Fugate v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1999

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API