United States v. Thomas Cameron Kincade
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:
We must decide whether the Fourth Amendment permits compulsory DNA profiling of certain conditionally-released federal offenders in the absence of individualized suspicion that they have committed additional crimes.
I
A
Pursuant to the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000 (“DNA Act”), Pub.L. No. 106-546, 114 Stat. 2726 (2000), individuals who have been convicted of certain federal crimes1 and who are *817incarcerated, or on parole, probation, or supervised release2 must provide federal authorities with “a tissue, fluid, or other bodily sample ... on which a[n] ...…
2Cases cited86 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by222 opinions
- Maryland v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Nicholas v. GoordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Hamilton v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Motley v. ParksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Kaemmerling v. LappinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
217 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.