Legal Opinion

United States v. Thomas Cameron Kincade

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 18, 2004No. 02-50380PublishedCited by 222 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:

We must decide whether the Fourth Amendment permits compulsory DNA profiling of certain conditionally-released federal offenders in the absence of individualized suspicion that they have committed additional crimes.

I

A

Pursuant to the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000 (“DNA Act”), Pub.L. No. 106-546, 114 Stat. 2726 (2000), individuals who have been convicted of certain federal crimes1 and who are *817incarcerated, or on parole, probation, or supervised release2 must provide federal authorities with “a tissue, fluid, or other bodily sample ... on which a[n] ...…

2Cases cited86 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by222 opinions

  1. Maryland v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. Nicholas v. GoordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  3. Hamilton v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. Motley v. ParksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. Kaemmerling v. LappinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008

217 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API