Legal Opinion
Minnesota Laborers Health & Welfare Fund v. Granite Re, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 2, 2014No. A12-1017PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAGE, Justice.
Appellant Granite Re, Inc. (Granite Re), seeks our review of a court of appeals decision reversing the dismissal of a lawsuit brought by respondents Minnesota Laborers Health and Welfare Fund, et al. (the Funds),1 seeking payment on a surety bond.2 The district court dismissed the Funds’ declaratory judgment claim, granting summary judgment to Granite Re, because, among other reasons, the Funds’ lawsuit was commenced after the one-year contractual limitations period set out in the bond had expired. The court of appeals reversed, holding that fraudulent concealment by the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Wild v. RarigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Bobich v. OjaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Hydra-Mac, Inc. v. Onan Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Schmucking v. MayoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Knutson Construction Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In re Packaged Seafood Products Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2017
- Rapp v. Green Tree Servicing, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- Melrose Gates, LLC v. Chor MouaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- St. Jude Med., Inc. v. CarterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
- Bank of America, N.A., as successor by merger to BAC Home Loans Servicing, L. P. v. Cheryl SmithCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.