Dinsmore v. Sachs
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City. (Duffy, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtStockbridge, J.
There is but a single question presented in this case, and that not one of special difficulty. It is whether the plaintiff, Marion G. Dinsmore, is entitled to be subrogated to the rights, if any, of .the Illinois Shrety Co. against Louis Sachs, under the circumstances of this case.
Counsel upon both sides have filed full briefs, with quite an extended citation of authorities, which in the view of this Court and in consonance with its decisions, do not call for any extended review or even enumeration. These have all been examined, but the separate consideration of each one would protract this…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Orem v. WrightsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
- Cushman v. Carbondale Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Poe v. Philadelphia Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
- Fuhrman v. FuhrmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1911
- Wallace v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
3Cited by6 opinions
- Schmid v. First Camden National Bank, C., Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1941
- Weast v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Bater v. CleaverSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
- H. Max Ammerman v. Lou MillerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Aetna Casualty and Sur. Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.