Poe v. Philadelphia Casualty Co.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City (Heuisler, J.). The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtPearce, J.
This is an appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court of Baltimore City dismissing the bill filed by Edwin W. Poe, Stuart S. Janney and Ernest J. Clark, receivers of the United Surety Company, against the Philadelphia Casualty Company. The bill alleges that the United Surety Company was a corporation under the laws of the State of Maryland engaged in the business of selling surety and casualty bonds in the State of Maryland and elsewhere as authorized by its charter.
2. That the Gore-Meenan Company was a corporation under .the laws of the State of ISTew York, engaged in a general contracting…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- American Employers' Liability Insurance v. FordyceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896
- Cushman v. Carbondale Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Stephens v. Pennsylvania Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Consolidated Real Estate & Fire Insurance v. CashowCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1874
- Glenn v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1830
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Hill v. Cross Country Settlement, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Bachmann v. Glazer & Glazer, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- Riemer v. Columbia Medical Plan, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Combs v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1924
- Smith v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.