Legal Opinion

Weast v. Arnold

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 10, 1984No. 62, September Term, 1983PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODOWSKY, Judge.

This is a suit against the makers of promissory notes which the payee pledged as collateral for a loan. The delinquent balance on that loan has been paid by the pledgor’s surety who thereby acquired the notes and who now sues on them. Contrary to the trial court’s conclusion we shall hold that the plaintiff enjoys holder in due course status, as transferee of the lender’s rights in the notes, but only to the extent of the lender’s security interest in the notes. The excess of the plaintiff’s claim is subject to a breach of contract defense on which the defending makers proved…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Williams v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Evergreen Amusement Corp. v. MilsteadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  3. Community Manage. Ass'n of Colorado Sp. v. TousleyColorado Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Orem v. WrightsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
  5. Western National Bank of Casper v. HarrisonWyoming Supreme Court · 1978

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. Chicago Title Insurance v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  3. Adams v. Madison Realty & Development, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  4. Commonwealth v. VickersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Allison-Kesley Ag Center, Inc. v. HildebrandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API