Legal Opinion
H. Max Ammerman v. Lou Miller
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided November 21, 1973No. 71-2048PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MATTHEWS, Senior District Judge:
This is the second appeal in this case. Mr. and Mrs. Ammerman, plaintiffs-appellants, first appealed from a District Court judgment dismissing their complaint on the ground that it failed to state a claim upon which’relief could be granted. On that appeal this Court reversed, holding that the allegations of the complaint were sufficient to withstand defendant’s motion to dismiss. Ammerman v. Miller, 139 U.S.App.D.C. 188, 432 F.2d 621 (1970).
After a trial on the merits, the District Court found against the Ammermans on their complaint for recission of two…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Davis v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- American Surety Co. v. Bethlehem National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Orem v. WrightsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
- Joe Heaston Tractor & Implement Company, a New Mexico Corporation v. Securities Acceptance Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Langeveld v. L. R. Z. H. Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
- Souder v. BrennanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1973
- District of Columbia v. Aetna InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- First National Bank in Grand Forks v. Haugen Ford, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- Port Distributing Corp. v. PflaumerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.