Legal Opinion
Bateson v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 18, 2000No. 96-40 CPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*163 ORDER
DAMICH, Judge.
I. Introduction
This military pay case is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Supplement the Administrative Record. In this ease, 12 Plaintiffs contend that they were involuntarily separated as a result of selection boards conducted in violation of statutory and regulatory procedural requirements. Plaintiffs seek reinstatement to active duty and correction of their military records. After careful consideration, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ Motion to Conduct Discovery to Supplement the Administrative Record.
II. Background
A. Procedural History
On January 30, 1996,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- David W. Heisig v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Sanders v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- Keebler Company v. Murray Bakery ProductsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Long v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
- Ron L. Fluellen,plaintiff-Appellant v. United States,defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Van Cleave v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Captain Ross E. Joslyn v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Prochazka v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Quinton v. States StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Sieben v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.