Prochazka v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BRADEN, Judge.
Plaintiff, a retired Captain in the United States Navy Judge Advocate General’s Corps (“JAGC”), contends that the Navy erred in determining the date of his mandatory retirement. Accordingly, Plaintiff seeks a correc*482tion of his military records to reflect the proper date on which he should have been retired, together with accrued pay and benefits.1
The manner in which Plaintiffs mandatory retirement date was determined and reviewed is central to this ease. Therefore, a discussion of the applicable statutes and regulations is required before reciting the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Arroyo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Lewis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Prochazka v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Prochazka v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Barna v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.