Legal Opinion

Quinton v. States States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 8, 2005No. 04-192 CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

GEORGE W. MILLER, Judge.

This ease is before the Court on defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for Judgment on the Administrative Record and plaintiffs Cross-Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record. Oral argument was held on January 14, 2005. For the reasons set forth below, defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for Judgment on the Administrative Record is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part and plaintiffs Cross-Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

BACKGROUND

The following facts are…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Chappell v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Gilligan v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. David W. Heisig v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Holt v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  2. Bader v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
  3. Draper v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
  4. Rosene v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026
  5. Viernes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API