Sieben v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Military Pay; 10 U.S.C. § 1201; Motion to Supplement the Administrative Record
OPINION AND ORDER
EDWARD J. DAMICH, Judge.
Pending before the Court is a motion filed by Plaintiff, Mary Sieben (“Sieben”), pro se,1 requesting leave to supplement the administrative record (“AR”) in this military pay case. Sieben’s motion was filed on September 19, 2012. The Government responded on October 9,2012. For the reasons that follow, Sieben’s motion is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part.
I. Background
a. Allegations
This is a military disability and retirement pay and benefits case brought by Sieben against…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Axiom Resource Management, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- David W. Heisig v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Skinner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Florida Home Medical Supply, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Ignatius M. Tee, Jr. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026
- Manker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
- Rcf Information Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
- SUFI Network Services, Inc.Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · 2015