Legal Opinion

Sieben v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided December 13, 2012No. 11-878CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Military Pay; 10 U.S.C. § 1201; Motion to Supplement the Administrative Record

OPINION AND ORDER

EDWARD J. DAMICH, Judge.

Pending before the Court is a motion filed by Plaintiff, Mary Sieben (“Sieben”), pro se,1 requesting leave to supplement the administrative record (“AR”) in this military pay case. Sieben’s motion was filed on September 19, 2012. The Government responded on October 9,2012. For the reasons that follow, Sieben’s motion is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part.

I. Background

a. Allegations

This is a military disability and retirement pay and benefits case brought by Sieben against…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Axiom Resource Management, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  4. David W. Heisig v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  5. Skinner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Florida Home Medical Supply, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  2. Ignatius M. Tee, Jr. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026
  3. Manker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
  4. Rcf Information Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
  5. SUFI Network Services, Inc.Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API