Legal Opinion

State v. Motsko

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1978No. Cr. 600PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VOGEL, Justice.

This is an appeal from a conviction under both counts of an information charging kid napping, a Class A felony, in Count 1, and aggravated assault, a Class C felony, in Count 2. 1 We affirm.

The trial was by a jury. The defendant claimed indigency and asked that a specific lawyer be appointed to represent him. This was done. The jury trial took nearly a week. The attorney on this appeal is not the same attorney who represented the defendant at the trial. The defendant did not testify in his own behalf.

On the evening of June 22, 1976, the complainant, a young woman 20 years of…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. United States v. BayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. People v. DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. People v. AdamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1973

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. State v. WhistnantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. State v. SalamonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  3. People v. MorganCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. LindNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. RonngrenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API