Legal Opinion
State v. Ronngren
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided January 16, 1985No. Crim. 1023, 1024PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Justice.
James and Judy Ronngren have appealed from judgments of conviction on charges of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver. We affirm.
For several days in October 1983, State and local law-enforcement officers conducted a surveillance of the Ronngren residence in Jamestown. Some of the surveillance activities were conducted from the home of the Ronngrens’ neighbors, the Kollmans. On October 20, 1988, the Stuts-man County State’s Attorney and members of the surveillance team sought a search warrant from the county court. Following the hearing, during which…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Burdeau v. McDowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- California v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Commonwealth v. UptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- State v. RingquistNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. MischeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. RydbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.